Topic summary
18% 14 analyzed articles/videos 7,730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation Efforts results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 2,254 hits . Analysis detected 16,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,858 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (23,753 of 24,545 topics). This Conservation Efforts is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Conservation Efforts
Topic details
Total words: 42,858
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 0.9% BS Score14 analyzed articles42.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst