Author summary
21% 20 analyzed articles/videos 10,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Baisas results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 1,481 hits . Analysis detected 21,615 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,233 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (8,252 of 8,706 authors). This Laura Baisas is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group. Laura Baisas
Author details
Total words: 51,233
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.2% percentile 1.0% BS Score20 analyzed articles51.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst