Topic summary
66% 41 analyzed articles/videos 30,454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Impact results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 10,402 hits . Analysis detected 84,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 145,657 analyzed words across 41 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (22,425 of 23,819 topics). This Community Impact is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Community Impact
Topic details
Total words: 145,657
Article count: 41
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 1.1% BS Score41 analyzed articles145.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 27% 8/4/2026, 5:44:27 PM