Topic summary
41% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Character Analysis results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 4,087 hits . Analysis detected 17,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,952 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (18,417 of 21,706 topics). This Character Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Character Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 27,952
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles28K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst