Topic summary
83% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Relationships results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,323 hits . Analysis detected 12,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,124 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,730 of 22,547 topics). This Celebrity Relationships is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Celebrity Relationships
Topic details
Total words: 13,124
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst