Author summary
⁠100%2 analyzed articles/videos889 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Kumamoto results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 1,302 hits. Analysis detected 8,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,556 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (814 of 9,058 authors). This Ian Kumamoto is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Ian Kumamoto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠91%Ian Kumamoto (selected)7%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,556
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510091.0% percentile
6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.6%36.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 30.9%30.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 28.6%28.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.3%9.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.3%12.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 30.9%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 28.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos