Topic summary
37% 14 analyzed articles/videos 4,487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Deaths results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,948 hits . Analysis detected 13,456 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,126 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (19,284 of 22,419 topics). This Celebrity Deaths is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Celebrity Deaths
Topic details
Total words: 23,126
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score14 analyzed articles23.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst