Author summary
35% 2 analyzed articles/videos 761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kierra Frazier results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 189 hits . Analysis detected 1,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,044 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,350 of 8,754 authors). This Kierra Frazier is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Kierra Frazier
Author details
Total words: 3,044
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst