Topic summary
91% 12 analyzed articles/videos 10,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ceasefire Negotiations results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 5,024 hits . Analysis detected 41,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,810 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (15,116 of 22,262 topics). This Ceasefire Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Ceasefire Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 43,810
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles43.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst