Topic summary
⁠67%4 analyzed articles/videos2,816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breakups results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Unattributed Quote, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 974 hits. Analysis detected 8,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,264 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (15,841 of 24,545 topics). This Breakups is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Breakups
Topic details
Total words: 11,264
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos