Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Jason Parham results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,916 hits. Analysis detected 14,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,859 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,600 authors). This Jason Parham is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jason Parham
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Jason Parham (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 20,859
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos