Topic summary
56% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Cruelty results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 3,052 hits . Analysis detected 19,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,922 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (19,058 of 23,727 topics). This Animal Cruelty is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Animal Cruelty
Topic details
Total words: 25,922
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles25.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.8% 11.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst