Topic summary
⁠81%5 analyzed articles/videos5,733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Strategy results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,875 hits. Analysis detected 19,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,932 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (17,822 of 24,545 topics). This Ai Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Ai Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 22,932
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos