Author summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eugene Kim results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 2,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (2,101 of 9,471 authors). This Eugene Kim is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Eugene Kim
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠78%Eugene Kim (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,828
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 11.8%11.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.4%7.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos