Topic summary
⁠84%3 analyzed articles/videos2,665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Market Trends results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 971 hits. Analysis detected 9,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,660 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (13,921 of 22,675 topics). This Ai Market Trends is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Ai Market Trends
Topic details
Total words: 10,660
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos