Topic summary
⁠72%5 analyzed articles/videos7,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Government results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 5,193 hits. Analysis detected 25,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,664 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (14,622 of 22,275 topics). This Ai In Government is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Ai In Government

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles28.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos