Author summary
44%5 analyzed articles/videos3,793 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DAVE COLLINS results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,820 hits. Analysis detected 10,456 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,013 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,096 of 8,786 authors). This DAVE COLLINS is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
DAVE COLLINS
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
42%DAVE COLLINS (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,013
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510042.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.0%14.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate