Topic summary
86% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Applications results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 1,288 hits . Analysis detected 7,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,229 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 70% (7,528 of 24,539 topics). This Ai Applications is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Ai Applications
Topic details
Total words: 6,229
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst