Topic summary
71% 16 analyzed articles/videos 12,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Affordable Care Act results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 4,352 hits . Analysis detected 36,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,280 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (21,347 of 24,390 topics). This Affordable Care Act is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Affordable Care Act
Topic details
Total words: 53,280
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score16 analyzed articles53.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst