Author summary
99% 3 analyzed articles/videos 978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Johnson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 1,725 hits . Analysis detected 11,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,948 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,260 of 9,471 authors). This Jake Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Jake Johnson
Author details
Total words: 5,948
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.7% percentile 4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 24.3% 24.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.3% 22.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.5% 6.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 29.0%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 24.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst