Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Rowland results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 76 hits . Analysis detected 502 faulty-reasoning hits from 208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of 99% (148 of 8,946 authors). This Christopher Rowland is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Christopher Rowland
Author details
Total words: 208
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.4% percentile 16.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles208 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 36.5% 36.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 32.7% 32.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 14.4% 14.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.8% 30.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 20.2% 20.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.4% 16.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.4% 14.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.2% 20.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.5%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 32.7%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias: Author 30.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 20.2%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 20.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.4%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Author 14.4%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 14.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst