Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Rowland results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 502 faulty-reasoning hits from 208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of 99% (148 of 8,946 authors). This Christopher Rowland is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Christopher Rowland
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
99%Christopher Rowland (selected)17%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 208
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510098.4% percentile
16.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles208 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.5%36.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 32.7%32.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 14.4%14.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 14.4%14.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 30.8%30.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 20.2%20.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.4%16.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 14.4%14.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 20.2%20.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 32.7%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Author 30.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 20.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Author 14.4%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 14.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos