Speaker summary
61% 189 analyzed articles/videos 14,601.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zohran Mamdani results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,718.486 hits . Analysis detected 16,804.521 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,601.333 analyzed words across 189 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (40,737 of 40,829 speakers). This Zohran Mamdani is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Zohran Mamdani
Speaker details
Total words: 14,601.333
Article count: 189
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score189 analyzed videos14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst