Author summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Huber results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 904 hits . Analysis detected 7,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,689 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (4,086 of 9,252 authors). This Matt Huber is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Matt Huber
Author details
Total words: 8,689
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst