Speaker summary
45% 41 analyzed articles/videos 3,547.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Jefferson results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 376.208 hits . Analysis detected 3,480.866 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,547.333 analyzed words across 41 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (45,208 of 45,380 speakers). This Thomas Jefferson is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Thomas Jefferson
Speaker details
Total words: 3,547.333
Content count: 41
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score41 analyzed videos3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst