Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video94.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shawna Casey results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 53.5% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 335.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (16,838 of 40,043 speakers). This Shawna Casey is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Shawna Casey
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠58%Shawna Casey (selected)38%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 94.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
37.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.1%65.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 26.8%26.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.8%26.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos