116-year-old Colorado town argues itself out of existence 16%

By Sage Kelley32%

7/30/2026, 1:56:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 754 faulty-reasoning hits from 744 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (22,282 of 26,281 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the article peer group.

A tiny town in southeast survived the Dust Bowl, the Great Depression and a century of decline. 
It could not survive a fight over a water bill. 
The Colorado Department of State officially declared the town of Hartman  located in southeast Colorado near the Kansas border in Prowers County  abandoned on July 29 after a resident sent in an application in June that alleged the town of 30 residents didn’t have a board of trustees or town clerk, could not hold elections, and could not fix a crumbling water infrastructure that has been around for nearly 100 years. 
“As of today, it has been over a month since we have chlorine in our water, our water smells horrible and not potable at this time,” resident Jessie Simmons wrote in the June 17 application, pointing toward the boiling order that had been in place since October 2025. 
The abandonment issues for the 116-year-old town started with a squabble. 
At a local government meeting on Jan. 23, mayor pro tem Tammy Lucero got into a physical altercation with trustee Melissa Venegas over a water bill issue, according to initial reports by Courthouse News. 
The mayor pro tem was in charge because the former mayor had already been recalled. 
Lucero and Venegas were both charged with misdemeanor counts of disturbing the peace and received deferred sentences. 
And, if that wasn’t enough to fill a soap opera, another trustee, Velma Cassanova-Cooper, suffered a seizure and went to the hospital. 
“Yelling and screaming has happened in Hartman since forever. 
Like, it’s never been a quiet, peaceful meeting ever,” Venegas told Courthouse News. 
“It’s always somebody hyped up about something, and it’s never turned physical.” 
The fight centered on Hartman's water system, for which the Colorado Department of Health and Environment gave over $1 million in reimbursement grants to work on. 
The trustees wanted to get the contracts rolling to fix the water. 
The board of trustees promptly paid the electric bill to keep water pumping until the beginning of July and resigned, leaving the town without any formal government until the official hearing with the Colorado Secretary of State's office on July 13. 
And now, without government officials, the town cannot enter contracts to fix the broken water system and receive the reimbursements. 
Despite officially losing the functioning government, it wasn't functioning much prior to the resignations. 
According to the abandonment order, the Division of Local Government for the Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) has visited the town 30 times since 2022 to help with “elections, turnover, recalls, resignations, budgets, audits, grant administration and training of new officials.” 
The state's exhibit binder paints one big picture of finger-pointing drama, with nearly 500 pages of infighting and emails sent from residents to state officials begging for help. 
In one audio example, members of the city government can be heard arguing over a DOLA representative, who in turn says there is “a lot of anger. 
A lot of blame.” 
“Our town is in crisis, and those in power, from local officials to state authorities, have failed us,” resident Shawna Casey wrote in a June 2025 letter to the Secretary of State's office. 
“The residents of Hartman, have witnessed blatant financial misconduct, including embezzlement of COVID relief funds, unauthorized checks written from the town’s account, and mismanagement of public funds  all of which have been deliberately concealed from the public.” 
In the state's order, another resident said, that Hartman “is not a failed town, but that Hartman is a town that was failed by the systems designed to protect it.” 
Under state law, DOLA can only help with the operations of towns, not actually take control. 
Counties also cannot take control until the town is considered abandoned, while the Secretary of State can only take over election control. 
So, in a small town that requires government officials to often work as volunteers, there is often no quick response when officials resign. 
A former state law prevented the Secretary of State from holding official abandonment proceedings until a town couldn't hold an election for at least five years. 
However, Gov. 
Jared Polis signed an amendment last year that allows expedited abandonment for towns with no government and water infrastructure problems. 
Otherwise, Hartman would have been waiting for help without water until 2030. 
Now, Hartman will become part of unincorporated Prowers County. 
All water infrastructure improvements will now fall under the county's control. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Sage Kelley: 1.8%Denver Westword: 1.8%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 1.5%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.5%This article: 7.7%Sage Kelley: 2.1%Denver Westword: 2.0%Availability Heuristic7.7%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.6%Sage Kelley: 0.8%Denver Westword: 0.4%Hindsight Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.9%Denver Westword: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Sage Kelley: 3.5%Denver Westword: 3.1%Framing Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.2%Denver Westword: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.5%Sage Kelley: 0.5%Denver Westword: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.5%This article: 5.5%Sage Kelley: 0.5%Denver Westword: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.8%Denver Westword: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Sage Kelley: 1.0%Denver Westword: 0.7%Pessimism Bias10.9%This article: 17.7%Sage Kelley: 6.2%Denver Westword: 5.5%Negativity Bias17.7%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.7%Denver Westword: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Sage Kelley: 1.4%Denver Westword: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.4%Denver Westword: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 2.5%Denver Westword: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.4%Denver Westword: 0.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.8%Denver Westword: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.5%Denver Westword: 1.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.4%Denver Westword: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 1.6%Sage Kelley: 0.3%Denver Westword: 0.7%Slippery Slope1.6%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Sage Kelley: 2.1%Denver Westword: 2.2%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.4%Denver Westword: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.6%Denver Westword: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.1%Sage Kelley: 6.7%Denver Westword: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion5.1%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.6%Denver Westword: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.3%Sage Kelley: 1.4%Denver Westword: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.3%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.4%Denver Westword: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Sage Kelley: 1.0%Denver Westword: 0.4%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.7%Sage Kelley: 1.9%Denver Westword: 1.5%Anecdotal6.7%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.1%Denver Westword: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%Sage Kelley: 0.7%Denver Westword: 0.8%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.8%Sage Kelley: 3.2%Denver Westword: 4.5%Biased Writer Voice3.8%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.5%Denver Westword: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

744 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers42%attributed speech432writer words
Selected voice

Shawna Casey

100%flagged-word coverage
71 attributed words23% of attributed speech55% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Shawna Casey: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.