Speaker summary
77% 22 analyzed articles/videos 1,807.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savannah Guthrie results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 762.599 hits . Analysis detected 2,570.279 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,807.667 analyzed words across 22 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (41,943 of 42,581 speakers). This Savannah Guthrie is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Savannah Guthrie
Speaker details
Total words: 1,807.667
Content count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score22 analyzed videos1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 42.2% 42.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst