Speaker summary
44% 99 analyzed articles/videos 3,543.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NYPD results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 390.006 hits . Analysis detected 3,141.002 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,543.333 analyzed words across 99 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,589 of 44,761 speakers). This NYPD is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. NYPD
Speaker details
Total words: 3,543.333
Article count: 99
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score99 analyzed videos3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst