amNewYork43%

Failure to signal leads to arrest of suspect in deadly Bronx shooting 1%

By Barbara Russo-Lennon25%

8/4/2026, 2:55:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 236 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (30,136 of 30,190 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the article peer group.

Police arrested a suspected gunman accused of shooting a man to death from behind on a Bronx street early Monday morning. 
Jose Kuilan, 47, of Morningside Drive in Manhattan, faces a list of charges after police said he allegedly shot and killed 50-year-old Trojan Hart at 672 Sagamore St. in Van Nest at around 6 a.m. on Aug. 
3. 
Officers caught Kuilian during a routine traffic stop in the Bronx at around 11:30 p.m. that evening, within the confines of the 49th Precinct, the same precinct where the murder took place. 
Kuilan was charged with murder, manslaughter, two counts of criminal possession of a weapon, two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance, and failure to use a signal light, according to the NYPD. 
Police could not say how Kuilan was linked to the homicide, but confirmed he and the victim did not know each other. 
According to police sources, cops from the 49th Precinct rushed to a home located at the scene after a 911 call reported that a man had been shot. 
Upon arrival, officers discovered a bloodied Hart, with multiple bullet wounds to his buttocks, lower back, and back of his head. 
EMS pronounced Hart dead at the scene. 
Police said Hart lived at E. 168th Street in Morrisania. 
Kuilan’s arraignment was pending on Tuesday. 
With reporting by Dean Moses. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 1.9%amNewYork: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.1%amNewYork: 0.7%Anchoring Bias13.6%This article: 11.9%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 4.2%amNewYork: 2.7%Availability Heuristic11.9%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.9%amNewYork: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.1%amNewYork: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.1%amNewYork: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 6.8%amNewYork: 4.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 1.2%amNewYork: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 1.2%amNewYork: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 3.6%amNewYork: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.1%amNewYork: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 4.5%amNewYork: 5.5%Negativity Bias20.8%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.8%amNewYork: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.8%amNewYork: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error9.3%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.2%amNewYork: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 1.7%amNewYork: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.8%amNewYork: 0.8%Recency Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.4%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 1.9%amNewYork: 2.7%Appeal to Authority14.4%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.5%amNewYork: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 1.1%amNewYork: 3.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.1%amNewYork: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.9%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 4.0%amNewYork: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion8.9%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 1.1%amNewYork: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.4%amNewYork: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.1%amNewYork: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 1.5%amNewYork: 1.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.3%amNewYork: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.9%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.6%amNewYork: 0.9%Unattributed Quote11.9%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.8%amNewYork: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 2.6%amNewYork: 3.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 2.0%amNewYork: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.0%amNewYork: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Barbara Russo-Lennon: 0.5%amNewYork: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

236 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker14%attributed speech202writer words
Selected voice

NY PD

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words100% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-13.9 ptsWriter: 13.9%NY PD: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.