Speaker summary
56% 2 analyzed articles/videos 403.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Chen results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Primacy Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 150 hits . Analysis detected 754.831 faulty-reasoning hits from 403.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (40,136 of 42,254 speakers). This Michael Chen is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group. Michael Chen
Speaker details
Total words: 403.333
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.0% percentile 6.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos403.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Primacy Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst