Author summary
54%8 analyzed articles/videos3,598 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terry Castleman results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 1,404 hits. Analysis detected 15,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,920 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (7,708 of 8,721 authors). This Terry Castleman is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Terry Castleman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
12%Terry Castleman (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 26,920
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510011.6% percentile
1.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles26.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate