Speaker summary
86% 4 analyzed articles/videos 477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jones results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 134 hits . Analysis detected 993 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of 25% (34,127 of 45,066 speakers). This Jones is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Jones
Speaker details
Total words: 477
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 15.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos477 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 100.0% 100.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 100.0% 100.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% 120% 120% Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Middle Ground: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst