Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Larkin results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 77 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (24,293 of 40,165 speakers). This John Larkin is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
John Larkin
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠40%John Larkin (selected)24%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.5% percentile
23.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 43.9%43.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos