Speaker summary
48% 40 analyzed articles/videos 1,335.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Appeal to Authority , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 188.697 hits . Analysis detected 1,622.54 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,335.667 analyzed words across 40 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (43,981 of 45,120 speakers). This Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Speaker details
Total words: 1,335.667
Content count: 40
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.6% BS Score40 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst