Speaker summary
77% 10 analyzed articles/videos 194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran's joint military command results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Appeal to Emotion , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 72.304 hits . Analysis detected 483.814 faulty-reasoning hits from 194 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.6% and a BS Rank of 32% (30,932 of 45,145 speakers). This Iran's joint military command is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Iran's joint military command
Speaker details
Total words: 194
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 18.6% BS Score10 analyzed videos194 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 29.2% 29.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 26.4% 26.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 20.0% 20.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 18.2% 18.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 28.3% 28.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 29.3% 29.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 20.0% 20.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 26.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst