Author summary
41%1 analyzed article/video892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JON GAMBRELL Associated Press results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 556 hits. Analysis detected 2,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,645 of 9,482 authors). This JON GAMBRELL Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
JON GAMBRELL Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
62%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510061.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.6%15.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos