Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiona Campbell results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 73.5 hits. Analysis detected 245 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (7,511 of 41,992 speakers). This Fiona Campbell is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Fiona Campbell
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠83%Fiona Campbell (selected)75%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos