Speaker summary
44% 11 analyzed articles/videos 598.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Moreno results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 197 hits . Analysis detected 1,012.612 faulty-reasoning hits from 598.667 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (40,964 of 44,114 speakers). This Emily Moreno is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Emily Moreno
Speaker details
Total words: 598.667
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 7.3% BS Score11 analyzed videos598.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst