Speaker summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These defense ministry results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 183 faulty-reasoning hits from 118 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (22,751 of 40,558 speakers). This defense ministry is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
defense ministry
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠44%defense ministry (selected)26%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 118
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
25.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos118 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.5%19.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos