Speaker summary
74% 14 analyzed articles/videos 1,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Cooper results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Negativity Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 294.759 hits . Analysis detected 1,185.969 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,133 analyzed words across 14 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 3% (43,937 of 45,145 speakers). This Brad Cooper is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Brad Cooper
Speaker details
Total words: 1,133
Content count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.7% percentile 4.7% BS Score14 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 26.0% 26.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst