Speaker summary
⁠63%3 analyzed articles/videos62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Herman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 67.8% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 172 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (23,517 of 45,133 speakers). This Bob Herman is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Bob Herman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠48%Bob Herman (selected)29%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
28.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 67.8%67.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.3%27.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 67.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos