Speaker summary
64% 93 analyzed articles/videos 6,945.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bernie Sanders results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 761.813 hits . Analysis detected 7,580.018 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,945.333 analyzed words across 93 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (43,251 of 43,392 speakers). This Bernie Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Bernie Sanders
Speaker details
Total words: 6,945.333
Article count: 93
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score93 analyzed videos6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst