Author summary
99% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abby Zimet results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 7,463 hits . Analysis detected 40,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,099 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,790 of 9,471 authors). This Abby Zimet is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Abby Zimet
Author details
Total words: 22,099
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 33.8% 33.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 17.4% 17.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.6%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 16.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst