Keyword summary
45% 15 analyzed articles/videos 11,599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Health Organization results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 4,002 hits . Analysis detected 23,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,683 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (50,513 of 52,123 keywords). This World Health Organization is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. World Health Organization
Keyword details
Total words: 50,683
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 1.0% BS Score15 analyzed articles50.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst