Author summary
84% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Corder results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 4,234 hits . Analysis detected 20,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,127 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,238 of 8,616 authors). This Mike Corder is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Mike Corder
Author details
Total words: 24,127
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles24.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst