Author summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Melzer results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 915 hits . Analysis detected 4,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,981 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,206 of 8,706 authors). This Natalie Melzer is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Natalie Melzer
Author details
Total words: 7,981
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst