Keyword summary
97% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weaponization results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 3,033 hits . Analysis detected 27,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,072 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 74% (15,004 of 56,940 keywords). This Weaponization is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Weaponization
Keyword details
Total words: 16,072
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst