Keyword summary
31% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Army results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 1,228 hits . Analysis detected 15,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,478 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (57,635 of 59,653 keywords). This U S Army is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. U S Army
Keyword details
Total words: 36,478
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 0.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles36.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst