Author summary
4% 1 analyzed article/video 3,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judith Kohler results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 491 hits . Analysis detected 2,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (9,311 of 9,471 authors). This Judith Kohler is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Judith Kohler
Author details
Total words: 12,648
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst