Author summary
11% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Akram Oubachir results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 227 hits . Analysis detected 1,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,432 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,614 of 9,213 authors). This Akram Oubachir is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Akram Oubachir
Author details
Total words: 5,432
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.3% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst